Origin of data and documents
Where the data comes from, who brought it into the workflow and in what state.
We design AI workflows by data sensitivity, regulation and internal rules. Depending on the specific process, we choose cloud, a private environment or a local model at the client.
It’s not only about where the model runs. It’s also about the origin of the data, access rights, the audit trail and processing rules. We design the data and security layers together.
Where the data comes from, who brought it into the workflow and in what state.
Who may see, change, approve or use the data in the workflow.
For every output it should be traceable what it was based on, which rule was applied and who confirmed it.
How long data is kept, when it is deleted and what may leave the company’s infrastructure.
There’s no single right deployment for everyone. For each workflow we decide where the data is processed, who has access to it and how much control the client needs.
Fast deployment for less sensitive scenarios, pilots and internal assistants.
A dedicated environment for scenarios that need greater control over access, logs and integrations.
The model runs at the client. Data never has to leave the company’s infrastructure.
Regardless of the chosen architecture, it must be clear what data is processed, who decides and how the output can be verified.
With cloud services we handle this both contractually and technically. With local models, always under the client’s rules.
We send into the workflow only what is necessary for the specific task.
We don’t keep data longer than makes sense for processing, audit or operations.
The AI prepares the basis. Responsibility remains with the designated role.
For every decision it should be traceable what it was based on and who confirmed it.
We describe the services, models and components used transparently.
We design workflows with the regulatory context, internal IT rules and the client’s security standards in mind.
We design the solution with data minimisation, the purpose of processing, access and processing relationships in mind.
For regulated processes we account for documentation, logging, control and traceability of outputs.
We respect internal IT policies, IAM, logging, change management and requirements such as ISO 27001 or ISO 9001.
The security and data layer at Inovai is owned by Radek Palla. He has 14+ years of experience in enterprise IT security, BI, data governance and international teams.
Experience from an international security environment at Forvia Hella Mohelnice.
Hands-on with firewalls, MFA, DMZ, endpoint protection, log analytics and security incidents.
Experience with reporting and governance over manufacturing MES data.
The most common questions about security, data processing and choosing the architecture.
It depends on the chosen architecture. It can run in the cloud, in a private environment or locally at the client. With the on-premise option, data never has to leave the company’s infrastructure.
Not with public models. With a local solution, controlled learning or evaluation on your own data can be an advantage, but always only under the client’s rules and with the client’s consent.
Yes. For sensitive scenarios we can design a local/on-premise option where the model runs in the client’s infrastructure.
It depends on the workflow and the client’s requirements. Typically only for as long as needed for processing, audit or operations.
For critical decisions, a human. The AI prepares a structured basis, but the final validation and responsibility remain with the designated role.